Total Fun
May 21st, 2007This post is about a conversation I once held with a good friend of mine, Nadav Sherman. It is not a very serious topic, so take it lightly. We were wondering how to calculate the total amount of fun a person has during his life time. We reasoned as follows:
The absolute state score (a.s.s.) of a person is a number ranking the person’s current state and possessions (it is a function of time). For example, if you have 500,000$ and a girl-friend, then your a.s.s. is higher than that of someone identical to you without a girlfriend, but lower than that of someone identical to you with an additional 1,000,000$. Note that we do not specify exactly how to calculate the a.s.s., but we believe that it can be defined such that claim 1 below will be true. The actual value of the a.s.s. is not directly correlated to the fun a person has – a person with a million dollars and a beautiful girl-friend can be sadder than a poor lonely guy.
We define the effective fun of a person as a measurement of the instantaneous fun a person has in a given moment (again, it is a function of time). Our first claim is:
claim 1: The effective fun equals the derivative of the a.s.s..
Again, this obviously depends on the exact function used to calculate the a.s.s.. Instead of proving the claim above, I will give an intuitive reasoning as to why it makes sense. It is obvious that if your a.s.s. is going up right now, you are happy, regardless of the actual value of the a.s.s.. Conversely, if your a.s.s. goes down you are sad, regardless of the value of your a.s.s..
Lets give an example. If you get a new girlfriend, your a.s.s. goes up and so your effective fun (its derivative) is positive. If you lose 100$ your a.s.s. goes down and so your effective fun is negative. The actual value of the a.s.s. does not matter – only changes in the a.s.s. influence your effective fun.
Please make sure you understand claim 1 before continuing to read (see also the following figure).

Now, in order to calculate the total amount of fun a person has in a given period we obviously integrate the effective fun function over the given period. We use the fundamental theorem of calculus, stating that the integral of the derivative of a function equals the function itself (note that as this is not the true fundamental theorem of calculus, which speaks solely of continuous functions, but its more in the spirit of it) to get the following:
claim 2: The total fun a person has in a given period is the a.s.s. value at the end of the period minus the a.s.s. value at the beginning of the period.
This leads us to our final (morose) conclusion:
The total fun a person has in his lifetime equals his a.s.s. on the day he was born minus his a.s.s. on the day he dies (no matter how long he lived or what happened during his lifetime).
May 21st, 2007 at 10:20 pm
Now, a person doesn’t really control the way he is born, but, he can control the way he dies.
That’s why it is best to shoot yourself, the day you win the lottery and make love to two twin blonds.
May 22nd, 2007 at 12:49 am
You are absolutely right. A very good point indeed.
May 22nd, 2007 at 1:16 pm
I really like the graph!
but the theory is totally flawed.
it is a known fact that people who have been raped or abused as kids are haunted all their lives regardless to the fact that they are now probably in a much better situation.
a more real equation for happiness would be
(2*[current a.s.s.] – max(a.s.s))*min(a.s.s.)
and as you see happiness is measured by squared ass which makes more sense
May 23rd, 2007 at 6:37 pm
Yair, while your equation makes some sense (I agree that there are long-term effects of the a.s.s. on the effective fun, which are not taken into account by the derivative claim) I think these long term effects are much smaller than local variations. Maybe the proper way to consider these effects is to include them in the a.s.s. calculation (i.e. maybe the a.s.s. function of a person that was once raped is very different than the a.s.s. function of other people).
May 24th, 2007 at 8:13 pm
My mommy say that I had a nice ass when I was born – I conclude by this theory that my total fun potential is limited?